 |
| Really more of a confession than a “contradiction”…! |
 |
| Alleged biological evolution of eyesight…! |
AN EVOLUTION DECLARATION AND CONTRADICTION(OR CONFESSION)
Arrival of the Fittest: Solving Evolution’s Greatest Puzzle Kindle Edition
by Andreas Wagner (Author)
http://www.amazon.com/Arrival-Fittest-Solving-Evolutions-Greatest-ebook/dp/B00INIQTA6/ref=pd_sim_351_3?ie=UTF8&dpID=51WDldlORwL&dpSrc=sims&preST=_AC_UL160_SR104%2C160_&refRID=0KBNRG27W8TD9PHZ6WY4
The Magic of Reality: How We Know What’s Really True Paperback – Sep 11 2012
by Richard Dawkins
http://www.amazon.ca/Magic-Reality-Know-Whats-Really/dp/1451675046/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1451281442&sr=8-2&keywords=richard+dawkins
Evolution of the eye
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evolution-of-the-eye/
[[[“…
“Natural selection can preserve innovations, but it cannot create them. Nature’s many innovations—some uncannily perfect—call for natural principles that accelerate life’s ability to innovate.”
Darwin’s theory of natural selection explains how useful adaptations are preserved over time. But the biggest mystery about evolution eluded him. As genetics pioneer Hugo de Vries put it, “natural selection may explain the survival of the fittest, but it cannot explain the arrival of the fittest.”
Can random mutations over a mere 3.8 billion years really be responsible for wings, eyeballs, knees, camouflage, lactose digestion, photosynthesis, and the rest of nature’s creative marvels? And if the answer is no, what is the mechanism that explains evolution’s speed and efficiency?
In Arrival of the Fittest, renowned evolutionary biologist Andreas Wagner draws on over fifteen years of research to present the missing piece in Darwin’s theory. Using experimental and computational technologies that were heretofore unimagined, he has found that adaptations are not just driven by chance, but by a set of laws that allow nature to discover new molecules and mechanisms in a fraction of the time that random variation would take.
Consider the Arctic cod, a fish that lives and thrives within six degrees of the North Pole, in waters that regularly fall below 0 degrees. At that temperature, the internal fluids of most organisms turn into ice crystals. And yet, the arctic cod survives by producing proteins that lower the freezing temperature of its body fluids, much like antifreeze does for a car’s engine coolant. The invention of those proteins is an archetypal example of nature’s enormous powers of creativity.
Meticulously researched, carefully argued, evocatively written, and full of fascinating examples from the animal kingdom, Arrival of the Fittest offers up the final puzzle piece in the mystery of life’s rich diversity.
…”]]]
———————–
{{{“…
The evolution of the eye has been a subject of significant study, as a distinctive example of an analogous organ present in a wide variety of taxa. Complex, image-forming eyes have evolved independently some 50 to 100 times.[1]
Complex eyes appear to have first evolved within a few million years, in the rapid burst of evolution known as the Cambrian explosion. There is no evidence of eyes before the Cambrian, but a wide range of diversity is evident in the Middle Cambrian Burgess shale, and the slightly older Emu Bay Shale.[2] Eyes show a wide range of adaptations to meet the requirements of the organisms which bear them. Eyes vary in their visual acuity, the range of wavelengths they can detect, their sensitivity in low light levels, their ability to detect motion or resolve objects, and whether they can discriminate colours.
…”}}}
…Though Evolutionists claim there are in Nature all or most of steps for the developing of eyes and “eyesight”…! The Mind/Brain has to process all information from the Human Eye…!
…Andreas Wagner, is more “honest with others and herself”, and clearly declares that “Natural selection can preserve innovations, but it cannot create them”.
THOUGH I DOUBT THAT other Evolutionists accept this, as others declare that EYES evolved from mere “light detecting simple structures” to more complex ones…! THIS IS A BIT CONTRADICTORY with ANDREAS WAGNER…!
SO FOLKS, EVOLUTIONISTS REALLY ARE A PACK OF MERE STORY TELLERS, of a reality they do not really see nor understand…!
That is what RICHARD DAWKINS fails when he declares Evolution Science and him know the reality that surrounds them…!
WHAT WE DO NOT KNOW, does not permit us in logic to merely to jump to conclusions to the OPPOSITE, if the opposite is more than one possibility, making it an other possibility, even beyond our minds…!
But never, never, the Bible or Jehovah or Jesus…!
Richard Dawkins and Andreas Wagner and Evolution Science, are merely big nice “words”, mostly beyond reality…!
I WILL TELL YOU ONE CLEAR PROBLEM and better LOGIC and pure logic(prove your logic):
…When they make a cell and life in the Laboratory, and then a multicellular being with its first simple light detector, that they can make develop into a human eye, by itself, we then can believe Science…!
BUT IT WOULD BE IN SOME INSTANCES, MERELY ADVANCED GENETIC ENGINEERING, OF SOME KIND…!
RICHARD DAWKINS has merely fame as Jesus or Santa do! Believe me, his best logic, is if you cannot explain the existence of a God (one/uno), then the obvious is only one possibility, the easy solution of ATHEISM and Evolution…!
This simplistic logic has made him so famous as Science Evolution…!
THIS WORLD IS RUN BY IGNORANCE AND “BIG STORY TELLERS”…! As if we are all little children…!
.
.
.
anagrammatt 3 